By selecting the 'Susbcribe & Save' option you are enrolling in an auto-renewing subscription of Zookal Study Premium. Cancel at anytime.
Auto-Renewal
Your Zookal Study Premium subscription will be renewed each month until you cancel. You consent to Zookal automatically charging your payment method on file $19.99 each month after 1st month free period until you cancel.
How to Cancel
You can cancel your subscription anytime by visiting Manage account page, clicking "Manage subscription" and completing the steps to cancel. Cancellations take effect at the end of the 1st month free period (if applicable) or at the end of the current billing cycle in which your request to cancel was received. Subscription fees are not refundable.
Zookal Study Premium Monthly Subscription Includes:
Ability to post up to ten (10) questions per month.
20% off your textbooks order and free standard shipping whenever you shop online at
textbooks.zookal.com.au
Unused monthly subscription benefits have no cash value, are not transferable, and expire at the end of each month. This means that subscription benefits do not roll over to or accumulate for use in subsequent months.
Payment Methods
Afterpay and Zip Pay will not be available for purchases with Zookal Study Premium subscription added to bag.
$1.00 preauthorisation
You may see a $1.00 preauthorisation by your bank which will disappear from your statement in a few business days..
Email communications
By adding Zookal Study Premium, you agree to receive email communications from Zookal.
Law, Economics, and Morality examines the possibility of combining economic methodology and deontological morality through explicit and direct incorporation of moral constraints into economic models. Economic analysis of law is a powerful analytical methodology. However, as a purely consequentialist approach, which determines the desirability of acts and rules solely by assessing the goodness of their outcomes, standard cost-benefit analysis (CBA) is
normatively objectionable. Moderate deontology prioritizes such values as autonomy, basic liberties, truth-telling, and promise-keeping over the promotion of good outcomes. It holds that there are constraints on
promoting the good. Such constraints may be overridden only if enough good (or bad) is at stake. While moderate deontology conforms to prevailing moral intuitions and legal doctrines, it is arguably lacking in methodological rigor and precision.Eyal Zamir and Barak Medina argue that the normative flaws of economic analysis can be rectified without relinquishing its methodological advantages and that moral constraints can be formalized so as to make their analysis more
rigorous. They discuss various substantive and methodological choices involved in modeling deontological constraints. Zamir and Medina propose to determine the permissibility of any act or rule infringing
a deontological constraint by means of mathematical threshold functions. Law, Economics, and Morality presents the general structure of threshold functions, analyzes their elements and addresses possible objections to this proposal. It then illustrates the implementation of constrained CBA in several legal fields, including contract law, freedom of speech, antidiscrimination law, the fight against terrorism, and legal paternalism.