By selecting the 'Susbcribe & Save' option you are enrolling in an auto-renewing subscription of Zookal Study Premium. Cancel at anytime.
Auto-Renewal
Your Zookal Study Premium subscription will be renewed each month until you cancel. You consent to Zookal automatically charging your payment method on file $19.99 each month after 1st month free period until you cancel.
How to Cancel
You can cancel your subscription anytime by visiting Manage account page, clicking "Manage subscription" and completing the steps to cancel. Cancellations take effect at the end of the 1st month free period (if applicable) or at the end of the current billing cycle in which your request to cancel was received. Subscription fees are not refundable.
Zookal Study Premium Monthly Subscription Includes:
Ability to post up to ten (10) questions per month.
20% off your textbooks order and free standard shipping whenever you shop online at
textbooks.zookal.com.au
Unused monthly subscription benefits have no cash value, are not transferable, and expire at the end of each month. This means that subscription benefits do not roll over to or accumulate for use in subsequent months.
Payment Methods
Afterpay and Zip Pay will not be available for purchases with Zookal Study Premium subscription added to bag.
$1.00 preauthorisation
You may see a $1.00 preauthorisation by your bank which will disappear from your statement in a few business days..
Email communications
By adding Zookal Study Premium, you agree to receive email communications from Zookal.
In this book Professor Denis Ong, author of the acclaimed works Trusts Law, Ong on Equity and Ong on Specific Performance, addresses the complexities of the equitable doctrine of Subrogation. This lucid text ranges over all areas where the doctrine is most commonly applied – insurance, trusts and the administration of estates, and sureties.
Generally, the key principles of law are identified and the key cases, across Australian and international jurisdictions, discussed in detail.
Ong on Subrogation has been cited in the Victorian Court of Appeal in Commonwealth v Byrnes and Hewitt [2018] VSCA 41 (a decision of a five-member bench of the Court):
104. More recently, Ong, (1) frankly designates the High Court’s decision ‘inaccurate’. He concludes that due to its ‘disappointing’ and fundamentally mistaken omission to acknowledge and apply the established distinction between exoneration and recoupment, the plurality made inaccurately wide statements, which unduly restricted the respective entitlements of both trust and non-trust creditors. Ong acknowledges, that, at one point at least, the plurality seem to suggest that the trustee’s charge securing the right of indemnity enures for the benefit of all its creditors. Ong considers that to be contrary to the fundamental, purpose-restricted nature of that right. Ong states that on the basis of the established principles articulated in In re Richardson, the High Court should have clearly endorsed the trust creditors’ unique access to the right of indemnity in its exoneration aspect.
(1) Denis Ong, Ong on Subrogation (Federation Press, 2014) 33–8.